Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Background: Three San Francisco health system emergency departments have developed Geriatric Emergency Department (GED) models of care programs supporting and providing care for emergency department (ED) patients at risk for or living with dementia. Each system recognized: 1) the high proportion of older adult ED patients and those at risk for dementia, 2) the need to identify cognitive impairment in older adult ED patients, 3) the importance of developing approaches to connect older adult ED patients and their care partners with resources and diagnostic specialty services. Methods: We describe how each hospital adopted and implemented pragmatic GED models of care to support and improve care for ED patients at risk or living with dementia. We also report the proportion of ED encounters made by patients with dementia histories and the number of these reached by GED programs. Results: Three San Francisco hospitals (a tertiary care, critical access, and large integrated health system-community ED) independently implemented GED programs to support and enhance emergency care for patients living with dementia. Each uses screening and assessment tools to identify patients at risk for cognitive impairment. Each captures screening and assessment data to facilitate care and resources for post-discharge care, ensuring coordinated transitions and support for older adults. Programs varied by target patient population age and staff and resource allocation to support program goals. Site-specific pathways differed by location, patient populations, and support from geriatrics, emergency medicine, palliative medicine, neurology, psychiatry, pharmacy, referral processes, and/or pastoral care. Conclusions: Developing GED care interventions that facilitate care for patients at risk of or living with dementia is possible and sustainable when the pathway aligns with health system leadership goals through persistent value demonstration, communication, and promotion. Ultimately, developing and disseminating models of GED care is designed to address geriatric syndromes inclusive of dementia care through continuous quality improvement.

The Dementia Trials Accelerator (DTA) is a UK-wide programme designed to improve the feasibility, efficiency, and inclusiveness of recruitment into clinical trials of dementia and related brain-health conditions. Dementia trials are frequently constrained by the difficulty and cost of identifying eligible participants, which often requires cognitive assessments and measurement of blood-based biomarkers. The DTA addresses these barriers with two linked services. First, the DTA provides a federated platform to improve findability of potential participants across existing UK-based cohorts with consent to recontact. A single point of contact across multiple cohorts would allow increased efficiency of search for participants for studies. Second, the DTA provides a community-centred pre-screening service with information relevant to trial eligibility and a linked plasma and DNA tissue bank, with participant consent for recontact. Participants aged 65-75 years are approached via existing cohorts and registries. Consenting participants complete an online questionnaire and digital cognitive assessment, attend an in-person assessment for physical measures and face-to-face cognitive testing, and provide venous blood samples which are processed to plasma and whole blood for long-term storage and biomarker measurement. The initial programme target is to recruit at least 10,000 participants into the DTA pre-screening service. The DTA is designed to support approved academic and industry studies by enabling the DTA team to approach eligible participants for specific studies, without transferring identifiable information without consent. In parallel with its immediate trial-readiness purpose, the DTA is positioned to interoperate with emerging national approaches to biomarker-led recruitment by generating high-quality, recontactable cohorts with standardised cognitive characterisation and scalable biosampling suitable for blood-based biomarkers.

Vascular dementia (VaD) is a complex clinical syndrome arising from cerebrovascular disease, characterized by cognitive decline and functional impairment, and is projected to double in prevalence over the next three decades. Deficiencies in one-carbon (1C) metabolism are linked to the onset of VaD. Our previous work using mouse models has demonstrated that reduced dietary folic acid intake or genetic disruptions in 1C metabolism exacerbate outcomes in a model of VaD. However, the impact of VaD on one-carbon metabolism remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide a detailed molecular portrait of 1C metabolism within the context of VaD, shedding light on potential molecular mechanisms. In post-mortem medial prefrontal cortex tissue from VaD female and male patients and controls we measured protein expression of the folate receptor (FR) and 1C enzymes including methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), thymidylate synthase (TS), choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), cystathionine {beta}-synthase (CBS) co-localized with NeuN. There was an interaction between VaD and gender for levels of FR. Both male and female VaD had increased levels of ChAT. Female VaD patients had higher levels of MTHFR and CBS when compared to males. VaD is a complex disease; the results of this study demonstrate that VaD impacts neuronal levels of 1C enzymes. Future studies should assess 1C in other cell types of the brain, as well as measure enzyme activity levels.

INTRODUCTION: Characterizing the prognostic utility of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in predicting longitudinal cognitive trajectories is essential; however, population-based evidence is needed. METHODS: We evaluated plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) in 4,971 dementia-free individuals aged 70 years and older from the population-based Norwegian HUNT study. Predefined cut offs categorized biomarker ranges (p-tau217: low, intermediate, high; NfL: low, high), in addition to continuous biomarker analysis. RESULTS: Adjusted for other risk factors, higher baseline p-tau217 and NfL ranges indicated a significantly increased dementia risk after four years compared to low ranges (intermediate p-tau217: risk ratio [RR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.50; high p-tau217: RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.73-2.44; high NfL: RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.31-2.27; jointly high p-tau217 and NfL: RR 3.32, 95% CI 2.61-4.23). The estimated cumulative risk of all-cause dementia was 10.6% (95% CI 9.3-12.1) for low p-tau217, 16.9% (95% CI 14.6-19.5) for intermediate p-tau217, 33.0% (95% CI 29.9-36.1) for high p-tau217, 15.7% (95% CI 14.4-17.0) for low NfL, 35.4% (95% CI 30.6-40.5) for high NfL, and 47.8% (95% CI 40.7-55.0) for jointly high p-tau217 and NfL. The association of p-tau217 with incident dementia differed by sex. DISCUSSION: These findings support the use of blood-based biomarkers for population-level dementia risk stratification, underscore the value of combining markers to improve prognostic precision, and can aid clinicians using plasma p-tau217 or NfL in interpreting dementia risk.

Background: ACE variants are genetic risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD), potentially through reduced enzymatic activity and impaired amyloid {beta} hydrolysis. Objectives: To create a publicly available database of ACE variants relevant to ACE deficiency and AD, and to estimate the population frequency of damaging ACE variants and their impact on blood ACE levels. Methods: ACE variants were compiled from literature, public databases (VarSome, dbSNP, ClinVar, gnomAD), and sequencing data (WES/WGS) from 5147 Russian individuals. Variants were classified using a consensus in silico score (AlphaMissense, MetaRNN, EVE). Blood ACE levels were measured in 330 carriers of 64 different ACE mutations. Results: We identified 1682 unique ACE variants. Of these, 608 (36.2%) were classified as functionally damaging, including 17 signal peptide, 210 loss of function, and 381 missense variants. The estimated carrier frequency of damaging ACE variants was 2 % (1/50). Notably, 24 variants associated with experimentally confirmed reductions in blood ACE levels had a combined estimated carrier frequency of 3.9 % in the general population, calculated from cumulative gnomAD v4.1.0 allele frequencies under a rare-variant independence model. An open-access browser is available at https://ace-browser.com/. Conclusions: Variants associated with reduced blood ACE levels were estimated to be carried by approximately 1 in 25 individuals in the general population. This frequency is of the same order of magnitude as the 13.2% prevalence of Alzheimer's dementia in individuals aged 75-84 years (Alzheimer's Association, 2025), consistent with the hypothesis that ACE deficiency may represent an underrecognized contributor to late-onset AD susceptibility. The ACE mutations-AD browser and integrated genotype-phenotype data presented here provide a novel resource for future basic, translational, and clinical research on ACE-dependent AD.

Persistent racial disparities in dementia raise concerns regarding the validity and generalizability of existing prognostic models across diverse populations. We evaluated the utility of the 2024 Lancet Commission risk factors and resting heart rate (RHR) for race-specific dementia risk prediction using data from 55,004 participants in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center cohort. Cox proportional hazards and Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were developed separately for Black, White, Asian, and American Indian participants to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year time to dementia. RSF consistently outperformed Cox models across all racial groups and prediction horizons, achieving 5-year AUCs of 0.88-0.91 compared with 0.69-0.81 for Cox models. Inclusion of RHR modestly and consistently improved predictive performance across racial groups. Predictor importance varied between racial groups, suggesting heterogeneity in dementia risk profiles and disease presentation. These findings support the potential utility of RHR as a complementary prognostic biomarker and highlight the importance of equitable, personalized dementia risk prediction across diverse populations.

Early identification of cognitive impairment remains challenging in settings where comprehensive cognitive and clinical assessments are not available. Acoustic and linguistic features in naturalistic speech may serve as useful behavioural markers of cognitive impairment, but the value of integrating these measures with cognitive assessment remains unclear. We tested whether combining acoustic and linguistic features from one-minute speech samples with multi-domain cognitive assessment (spanning attention, language, memory and executive functions) improves classification of cognitively unimpaired individuals from those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or early-stage Alzheimer's Disease. Across multiple machine learning models, combining cognitive, acoustic and linguistic features yielded significantly better classification performance than models using cognitive or speech features alone (area under the curve = 0.96-0.98, both comparisons p < .05). This proof-of-concept study reveals that integrating speech-based measures with cognitive testing may improve identification of cognitive impairment, supporting the development of accessible and scalable multimodal screening tools for primary care.

Background: The Centiloid (CL) scale standardizes global amyloid PET quantification and is widely used to define amyloid positivity. As a global summary measure, however, CL may not fully reflect the regional distribution of amyloid deposition, which can carry additional prognostic information about the rate of cognitive decline. Objective: To develop and externally validate a fixed, regional amyloid PET composite score that complements CL for predicting cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Methods: The Regional Amyloid PET Score (RAPS) was derived from 82 FreeSurfer regions using machine learning with bootstrap stability selection to predict the rate of change in CDR-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) in 433 amyloid-positive ADNI [18F]florbetapir participants. The fixed nine-region weights were applied without retraining in a cross-tracer ADNI [18F]florbetaben subset (N = 71; largely overlapping the discovery participants) and two external validation cohorts, NACC SCAN (N = 1531; four tracers) and OASIS-3 (N = 428). Results: RAPS comprised nine regions. In ADNI, RAPS correlated more strongly with CDR-SB slope than CL and showed higher discrimination of rapid decliners (AUC 0.813 vs 0.713). Performance was directionally consistent across validation cohorts; in NACC SCAN, RAPS and CL independently predicted clinical progression. Cross-cohort meta-analysis of the three independent cohorts supported incremental discrimination beyond CL (pooled {Delta}AUC +0.066; I2 = 0%). Conclusions: RAPS, a fixed regional amyloid PET-derived score, may complement CL for prognostic stratification in Alzheimer's disease research.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid beta and tau accumulation accompanied by altered inflammatory responses. Sex is an important modifier of AD risk and pathology, however, its influence on relationships between peripheral inflammatory markers and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether sex modifies peripheral inflammatory biomarker relationships associated with AD pathology and clinical stage. Materials and Methods: Twelve CSF biomarkers and 41 plasma biomarkers spanning AD pathology, neurodegeneration, and inflammation were measured on the Luminex platform in a cross-sectional cohort of 261 participants from the Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health Biobank. Associations were evaluated in sex-adjusted, sex-interaction, and sex-stratified models, accounting for age, APOE4 carrier status, and diagnosis. Results: Plasma IL-5 was inversely associated with clinical stage, and 10 plasma inflammatory markers, including Flt-3L, MCP-1, soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), TNF, IL-8, IL-5, IL-12P40, IL-1RA, fractalkine, and G-CSF, were inversely associated with the CSF pTau181/A{beta}42 ratio in pooled models adjusted for sex. Although formal biomarker x sex interactions did not survive FDR correction, significant associations between the CSF pTau181/A{beta}42 ratio and plasma MCP-1 and IL-12P40 were observed in females but not males. Discussion: Our findings identify a group of peripheral inflammatory markers associated with AD pathology and suggest that some of these relationships may vary by sex, warranting larger studies to clarify the role of sex in AD pathobiology.

Importance. Metformin may influence risk of dementia, with prior conflicting observations of protection or harm. Objective. To determine the association of randomization to metformin vs. placebo or intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) with cognitive outcomes (cognitive impairment syndromes and trajectories of cognitive test performance) during the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS). Design, Setting & Participants. Prospective long-term follow-up of DPP/DPPOS participants at 27 U.S. centers among adults who were at high risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) at baseline. Exposures. Randomization to metformin, placebo, or ILS (1996-1999) for 3.2 years followed by open-label metformin in the original randomized metformin group until 2021. Main Outcomes & Measures. Cognitive impairment syndromes were adjudicated in 2022-2024 in 1,483 participants (median age 74 [IQR 68, 80]) using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Dataset version 3. Cognitive performance in executive and memory domains was ascertained with repeated cognitive tests between 2009 and 2024. Multinomial logistic regression and mixed-effects models were fit to examine associations of randomization to metformin with cognitive outcomes. Results. Total metformin exposure (mean {+/-} SD) was 15.5 {+/-}7.7 years/person in the metformin group. Persons in the placebo and ILS groups received out-of-study metformin usually after developing diabetes with mean metformin total exposure of 4.5 {+/-}5.1 and 3.8 {+/-}4.8 years/person in the placebo and ILS groups, respectively. Overall, the frequency distributions of the cognitive syndromes did not differ significantly by treatment group; however, randomization to metformin was associated with a 60% (OR 0.40 [95%CI 0.17, 0.97]) and 62% (OR 0.38 [95%CI 0.16, 0.89]) lower odds of dementia compared with placebo and ILS, respectively, after adjustment for demographics, education, income, and APOE-{varepsilon}4 genotype. Randomization to metformin was also associated with significantly better memory performance over time ( {beta} =0.58; 95%CI: 0.09, 1.1; p=0.02; Cohen's d=0.1). Conclusions and Relevance. Long-term metformin treatment is associated with a reduced risk of dementia and better memory performance among persons with pre-diabetes or T2D. Estimates were imprecise due to a limited number of dementia cases. Longer follow-up with more dementia cases is needed to confirm our findings.

INTRODUCTION: Novel capillary-blood collection methods have not yet been evaluated for a wide range of central nervous system (CNS) and neurodegenerative disease-related proteins. Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders (ADRD) collected from devices like the Tasso+, a minimally invasive upper-arm capillary blood collection device, must be compared to traditional venipuncture to assess for validity. METHODS: Participants underwent blood collection via traditional venipuncture and Tasso+ in a clinical research setting. The Nucleic Acid Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA) CNS panel was used for biomarker quantification in venous and Tasso-derived plasma. RESULTS: Eighty-three participants (age mean{+/-}SD 76.8{+/-}8.2 years, 79.5% cognitively unimpaired) completed blood collection. Little to no correlation was found between venous and Tasso+ plasma for p-tau217, but the correlation was improved by using a brain-derived (BD)-p-tau217/BD-p-tau181 ratio. Extremely strong correlations were found for neurofilament light (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Among the 131 biomarkers measured, 51 (38.9%) had a Pearson R [&ge;] 0.90; 27 (20.6%) had values between 0.70-0.90; 26 (19.9%) had values between 0.30-0.70; and 27 (20.6%) had values [&le;] 0.30. DISCUSSION: The Tasso+ accurately measures NfL and GFAP, but caution is warranted when measuring other AD/ADRD biomarkers, as agreement with venous plasma appears to be protein or ratio dependent. These results highlight that important biomarker-specific differences must be considered when translating capillary blood collection approaches. They also further support foundations for development of these methods, highlighting both the opportunities and remaining challenges for translating the promise of blood-based biomarkers beyond AD/ADRD specialty clinics and research settings.

Background Fluid biomarkers enable the demonstration of the biological effects of novel therapies in Alzheimers disease (AD). However, longitudinal biomarker data are sparse and sample size calculations for fluid biomarkers are often lacking. Here, we provided longitudinal CSF and plasma AD biomarkers measured in samples collected in a placebo arm in a 1.5-year phase 2b trial, allowing us to study natural trajectories, required sample sizes and heterogeneity in early AD clinical trials. Methods We studied individuals from the placebo group (MCI due to AD (n=65) and AD dementia (n=41)) of the T-817MA trial (NCT04191486) with positive CSF AD biomarkers (mean age=69(7) years, Female=63%). Longitudinal biomarker changes in CSF (A{beta}42, A{beta}40, A{beta}42/40, pTau181, pTau217, NFL, tTau, YKL40, NRGN, ABL1, CHIT1, CLEC5A, ITGB2, MMP10, SDC4, SPON2, THBD) and plasma biomarkers (A{beta}42, A{beta}40, A{beta}42/40, pTau181, pTau217, NFL, GFAP) were analyzed with linear mixed-effect models. Required sample size estimates for predefined treatment effects were generated. Lastly, we investigated the influence of between person variability in biomarker change by simulating a randomized clinical trial (1:1) 10000 times, and assessed the group differences at 1.5 years. Findings Fourteen biomarkers changed over time, with the largest annual changes observed for plasma pTau217 (+9.8%), CSF MMP10 (+7.1%), and CSF NFL (+6.9%), and CSF A{beta}40 by (-4.0%), CSF pTau217 (-3.0%), and CSF NRGN (-2.5%). To show a 30% change, similar to biomarker effects of approved AD drugs, almost all markers required less than 45 patients per trial arm. To reach normalized levels, established CSF markers required lower sample sizes than plasma markers. The effects of heterogeneity over time were approximately twice as large in plasma compared to CSF. Interpretation These findings offer insights into the biomarker trajectories and power in early AD, supporting more informed endpoint selection and forming a frame of reference for the interpretation of treatment effects in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Chronological age and plasma p-tau217 each predicts cognitive decline, but whether their prognostic associations interact is unclear. In this study, we examined their joint associations in a memory-clinic cohort. METHODS: We included 3,741 participants from the Pittsburgh ADRC, with up to 28 years of follow-up (3.0 [IQR 2.0-6.0]). The primary outcome was increase in Clinical Dementia Rating global score (CDR-GS). Secondary outcomes included clinical-stage progression and longitudinal change in CDR Sum of Boxes. Plasma p-tau217 cut-off value was derived and externally validated in amyloid-beta-PET and autopsy sub-cohorts, respectively. Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models tested age-by-p-tau217 interactions while repeated cross-validation evaluated prognostic performance. RESULTS: Age and plasma p-tau217 interacted in their associations with CDR-GS progression ({chi}(1)2 = 23.94; p=9.81x10-7). Comparing the oldest displayed age with the youngest reference age, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 4.80 (95% CI 2.74-8.27) in the lowest vs. 1.05 (95% CI 0.69-1.47) in the highest p-tau217 quartile. Older age was associated with clinical progression at low-p-tau217 (HR=1.97; 95% CI 1.58-2.45) but not at high-p-tau217 (HR=1.10; 95% CI 0.95-1.26) concentrations; adjusted 5-year risk differences were 19.3 and 3.3 percentage points, respectively. Adding plasma p-tau217 improved 5-year discrimination most accurately among participants younger than 60 years (AUC 0.66-0.81). DISCUSSION: Prognostic association between age and clinical progression varies by plasma p-tau217 concentration. Age stratifies risk at low plasma p-tau217 levels, whereas elevated p-tau217 identifies higher risk across age groups and attenuates the age-related gradient. These findings support further evaluation of age-contextualized plasma p-tau217 interpretation for prognosis and trial enrichment.

Background: Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) comprises more than 95% of all AD cases. Transgenic, overexpression animal models have off target side effects, do not effectively produce the heterogeneity observed clinically in LOAD patients, and are therefore not best suited for preclinical therapeutic development. The Model Organism Development and Evaluation for Late-onset Alzheimer's Disease (MODEL-AD) Consortium was established to develop novel mouse strains to model human-relevant genetic and environmental risk factors for LOAD. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is an enzyme in the folate/methionine pathway. Variants in the MTHFR gene, notably 677C>T, are associated with ADRD, and we have previously shown the Mthfr677C>T mouse model phenocopies humans carrying the variant and develop cerebrovascular deficits. Methods: To examine the contributions of Mthfr677C>T in the context of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), MODEL-AD created a novel mouse strain on the C57BL/6J (B6) background that was homozygous for Mthfr677C>T, in combination with humanized Abeta;, APOEe4, and Trem2*R47H (referred to as LOAD2.Mthfr677C>T). Mice were assessed over multiple ages for disease-relevant phenotypes. Regular behavior measurements and biometric samples were collected longitudinally to 24 months of age. Blood and brain tissue were collected for transcriptomics, proteomics, human disease correlation, and neuropathology. Results: Despite lacking hallmark pathologies such as amyloid deposition and significant neuroinflammation, compared to LOAD2 controls, LOAD2.Mthfr677C>T mice showed transcriptional and proteomic signatures in the brain that relate to the cerebrovasculature, myelination, and synaptic biology, similar to those seen in human LOAD patients. Conclusions: These data further support the use of the LOAD2.Mthfr677C>T mouse model to study aspects of ADRD such as cerebrovascular compromise.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative amyloid-beta (A{beta})-PET is increasingly used in AD prevention trials. Although the Centiloid (CL) framework provides a common scale, variability persists across processing pipelines, including differences in template/native space, partial volume correction (PVC), and reference region. These choices may influence cut-points, and in turn positivity rates, as well as longitudinal accumulation rates. We examined cut-point estimates and inter-pipeline discordance in a community cohort where many are expected to have early A{beta} deposition. METHODS: We analysed [18F]florbetapir PET/MR data from predominantly cognitively unimpaired (~95%) individuals aged ~71 years at baseline (n=433) and at follow-up (n=328; ~2.4-year interval) in Insight 46 (1946 British birth cohort). Centiloids were derived using the standard pipeline and ten in-house pipelines employing alternative reference regions and PVC in native space. Gaussian mixture modelling estimated cut-points with bootstrapped uncertainty. We assessed A{beta}-discordance across pipelines as a function of standard CLs and examined follow-up CSF A{beta}42/A{beta}40 (n=120) and PET in individuals with discordant baseline classifications. RESULTS: Baseline cut-points were 10-23 CL across pipelines, classifying 16-25% as A{beta}-positive. Reliable accumulation cut-points were 3.5-6 CL/year, identifying 16-22% as accumulators. Uncertainty varied across pipelines. At baseline, 18% were discordant across PET measures, predominantly between 11-35 standard CLs. The discordant group showed higher A{beta}-PET accumulation and lower CSF A{beta}42/A{beta}40 than concordant negatives. CONCLUSIONS: Disagreement between A{beta}-PET methods was highest between 11-35 standard Centiloids and was frequently associated with accumulating A{beta}. These findings highlight the importance of considering cut-point uncertainty and methodological influences when interpreting early-stage amyloidosis.

Introduction. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), including aggression, psychosis, anxiety, apathy, and depression, affect up to 85% of individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and are among its most disabling and costly manifestations, accelerating cognitive and functional decline, institutionalization, mortality, and healthcare costs. NPS prevalence has largely been characterized using self-reported race. Whether NPS differs across genetically defined ancestry groups and whether self-reported race obscures these differences remains unknown, limiting accurate risk stratification and treatment development. Methods. Using whole-genome sequencing data from 7,118 ADSP participants, we defined three NPS clusters from the NPI-Q: early psychosis (CDR 0.5-1), late psychosis (CDR 2-3), and affective symptoms. Genetic ancestry was inferred by principal component clustering, identifying six groups (EUR, AFR, EAS, SAS, AMR, ADMIXED), and compared with self-reported race/ethnicity. NPS prevalence was compared across genetic ancestry groups and genetic ancestry and self-reported race using Fisher's exact and regression models. Results. Genetic ancestry assignment differed markedly from self-reported race, affecting NPS prevalence estimates. NPS prevalence also differed across ancestry groups; affective symptoms were highest in EAS (90%) and SAS (77%) and lowest in AFR (66%), while psychosis was highest in EAS (74%) and SAS (70%) and lowest in AMR (55%) and EUR (56%), with similar patterns for early and late psychosis. Discussion. Genetically defined ancestry alters NPS prevalence estimates in AD, suggesting that standard race categories obscure population-level disease burden and compromise risk stratification, screening, and trial design. Ancestry-associated differences suggest partially distinct genetic and environmental drivers, underscoring the need to incorporate genetic ancestry into AD research and care.

Introduction: Individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have an increased risk of developing dementia. Since there are currently no curative pharmacological therapies for MCI, nonpharmacological and exercise-related medical therapies represent a promising approach. This study aims to evaluate the effects of nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive performance in individuals with MCI. Methods and analysis: The study will be a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, single-centre superiority trial with a parallel-group design. A total of 100 patients aged 60 years with MCI will be randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups or the control group. The three intervention arms comprise high-intensity interval training (HIIT), yoga, and intermittent hypoxia-hyperoxia exposure (IHHE), whereas participants in the control group will receive a sham application of IHHE (IHHE-S). The primary outcome is the cognitive function after 3-month intervention period assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment. The secondary outcomes and the evaluation of modifiable risk factors for dementia include quality of life, laboratory data, physical activity, anthropometric data, and cardiorespiratory fitness. All harms and (serious) adverse events will be assessed systematically at each study visit. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Tuebingen (494/2025BO1). Research findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented to stakeholders and at scientific conferences.

Importance: Patients are increasingly learning Alzheimers disease (AD) genetic and biomarker results through electronic health portals. Evaluation of alternative scalable delivery models for return of AD risk information is needed to best support patient understanding and psychological well-being. Objective: To determine whether a patient-centered digital platform is comparable to clinician-mediated telehealth sessions for returning APOE and plasma pTau-217 results on outcomes of knowledge and psychological well-being. Design: The Evaluation of Self-Mediated Alternatives for Risk Testing Education and Return of Results (eSMARTER) study was a noninferiority trial of a patient-centered digital platform compared to clinician-mediated disclosure of APOE genotype and optional pTau-217 disclosure. Setting: Decentralized, fully remote trial enrolled participants in the contiguous United States (U.S.) between October 2024 and February 2025, with follow-up completed in November 2025. Participants: Eligible participants were aged 60-80 and had previously undergone APOE genotyping (without disclosure) via the GeneMatch program, passed psychological screening, had internet access, and were English-speaking. Interventions: Participants were randomized, 2:1, to the eSMARTER digital platform or clinician-mediated disclosure of APOE genotype. Following the 6-month post-APOE assessment, participants were offered optional pTau-217 disclosure via the same randomized modality. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes at 1-7 days following APOE disclosure included changes in anxiety, disease-specific distress, and AD-related knowledge within a priori non-inferiority margins. Results: 674 persons (mean [SD] age 68 [4.7] years; 451 [67%] female; mean [SD] telephone MoCA=19 [2]) were eligible and provided demographic information. 651 participants were randomized to clinician-mediated (n=216) or digital disclosure (n=435) and completed APOE disclosure (66 [10%] APOE4 homozygotes, 377 [58%] heterozygotes, 208 [32%] non-carriers). 604 participants completed the study; 500 completed optional pTau-217 disclosure. Baseline characteristics were balanced across groups. At 1-7 days following APOE disclosure, scores on AD-related knowledge, PROMIS Anxiety, and disease-specific distress measures met non-inferiority. Conclusions and Relevance: Disclosure of APOE genotype by the eSMARTER digital platform is non-inferior to clinician-mediated telehealth disclosure. No significant between group differences were found following disclosure of pTau-217 results. Together, these results suggest that this digital platform may provide an evidence-based scalable approach for returning AD genetic and biomarker results.

Background: Plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-Tau217) is a leading blood-based biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Robust analytical characterization on high-throughput platforms is essential for research use and clinical translation. Objective: To evaluate the analytical performance of an automated plasma p-Tau217 immunoassay and characterize its discrimination of PET-defined amyloid status. Methods: We performed analytical validation of the Access Research Use Only (RUO) plasma p-Tau217 immunoassay on the Beckman Coulter DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer and evaluated biomarker discrimination of PET-defined amyloid pathology in a subset of the Bio-Hermes-001 cohort spanning the symptomatic cognitive continuum (mild cognitive impairment or mild AD dementia; cognitively unimpaired participants excluded; n = 449). Analytical precision, sensitivity, linearity, specificity, interference, and sample stability were assessed per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Discrimination of PET-defined amyloid status was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve and indeterminate zone analyses. Results: The assay demonstrated high precision (within-laboratory CV </=7.1%), excellent sensitivity (limit of detection 0.018-0.021 pg/mL), linearity across the analytical measuring range (R-squared > 0.99), strong epitope specificity (</=1.0% cross-reactivity with other tau phosphoisoforms), and minimal interference from over 60 endogenous and exogenous substances. In 449 research participants plasma p-Tau217 showed strong discrimination between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative groups (AUC 0.881; 95% CI 0.846-0.915). Application of indeterminate zones systematically improved classification metrics at the cost of fewer definitive classifications. Conclusions: These findings support the Access p-Tau217 (RUO) assay as a robust, high-throughput assay for plasma biomarker-based discrimination of PET-defined amyloid pathology in AD applications.

INTRODUCTION: Neurodegenerative research identifies biomarkers to confirm presence of disease and inform about risk for clinical symptoms. Expert guidance advises caution about disclosing individual research results (IRR), but participant interest remains high even when IRR may not inform individual prognosis. Existing studies of stakeholder attitudes emphasize Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers. We explore participant attitudes toward IRR from the United States CADASIL Consortium (USCC), an observational study of Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), the most heritable form of vascular dementia. METHODS: Since CADASIL research participant attitudes are unstudied and AD-focused guidelines for IRR may not generalize to populations with dominantly inherited conditions, we surveyed USCC participants using three 5-point Likert items and one open-ended question. Descriptive statistics were analyzed for Likert items. The distribution of responses to one item was directly compared to an AD participant survey. Open-ended responses underwent qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: We received 152 responses. The highest-rated reason to return IRR was "learn about my disease and its predicted course". The highest-rated IRR were imaging/MRI scans and cognitive testing. Hypothetical negative outcomes were rated as a little to somewhat concerning. USCC respondents rated reasons to return IRR higher than AD counterparts, with statistically significant differences for seven of eight items. In open-ended responses, the most frequent code was "IRR return will help improve my health and well-being". DISCUSSION: Most respondents expressed support for disclosure upon participant request. These findings could inform IRR guidance for CADASIL and other disorders and investigations of personal utility.